> The description that General Relativity puts forth ... needs to be augmented to include an uncertain position that has a probability distribution to it.
i am sorry but 'needs' is too strong here
quantisation(o) was established before, necessarily so, probability was introduced to explain the behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena
to claim that probability is necessary for quantisation seems to have it reversed
the current understanding is both unknown whether gravity is quantised but also whether probability is necessary to describe quantum behaviour
with current understanding the only thing one can say with certainty is that requiring probability is a result of the math used to best model quantum behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena, namely fourier analysis(i)
i am sorry but 'needs' is too strong here
quantisation(o) was established before, necessarily so, probability was introduced to explain the behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena
to claim that probability is necessary for quantisation seems to have it reversed
the current understanding is both unknown whether gravity is quantised but also whether probability is necessary to describe quantum behaviour
with current understanding the only thing one can say with certainty is that requiring probability is a result of the math used to best model quantum behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena, namely fourier analysis(i)
(o) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_catastrophe
(i) https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/35746/is-there-a...