Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

How Condor differentiate itself from Ranch?



Ranch is merely a socket acceptor pool. Condor takes care of framing and buffering, also.


Doesn't native erlang handle that? With {packet, Len} and {active, once}?


Not the buffering.


You can set a user level buffer size of the socket driver, and a receive buffer size (see http://erlang.org/doc/man/inet.html).

Why is another level of buffering needed?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: