Probably because he didn't make it clear that the reason he brought up Medicare for All was because the whole reason contractors are so prevalent is so you don't have to pay for healthcare for them, effectively separating your workers into two classes.
Medicare for All would be beneficial in this example as it would totally remove the burden on company to provide a healthcare plan.
Without that crucial context, it sounds like he's just randomly bringing up hot-button political issues.
Medicare for All would be beneficial in this example as it would totally remove the burden on company to provide a healthcare plan.
Without that crucial context, it sounds like he's just randomly bringing up hot-button political issues.