> If it was gun control specifically targeting people based on race, sexuality, etc then yes.
I think the "specifically targeting" aspect is an odd choice of standard.
You're saying if a CEO advocated for restricting gun rights for everyone, that would be acceptable.
If a CEO advocated for restricting free speech for everyone...would that too be acceptable?
> If it was gun control specifically targeting people based on race, sexuality, etc then yes.
I think the "specifically targeting" aspect is an odd choice of standard.
You're saying if a CEO advocated for restricting gun rights for everyone, that would be acceptable.
If a CEO advocated for restricting free speech for everyone...would that too be acceptable?