Thanks for the link. I'd like to see intelligent changes to the system in these cut and dry cases where we are unlikely to do harm through action. The problem is, I don't think statins, the first drug in the article, fall under that category.
BTW, the 33% number you cite in parent comment doesn't include responses to the pap smear question, only the pelvic exam, and is specific to family doctors.
BTW, the 33% number you cite in parent comment doesn't include responses to the pap smear question, only the pelvic exam, and is specific to family doctors.