Are you saying that the happy path of SBCL static typing—given you *also* want t... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		YouAreGreat on July 15, 2018 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Lisp and Haskell (2017) Are you saying that the happy path of SBCL static typing—given you also want to use lists, and also not be inundated with spurious warnings—is to declare everything to be of type T?

_ph_ on July 15, 2018 [–]

No, I am not. Perhaps you read up a bit about Common Lisp and SBCL before we continue the discussion.

Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact