Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was wondering about this. If everything goes through an already installed browser, then what is the advantage that browsh has over a minimalistic fork of Firefox with e.g., lower bandwith features?



For this to actually give a bandwidth advantage I think the browser would have to be running on a server somewhere... so the browser has become the server.


I guess the point is to install this on some random server somewhere that you can then SSH to. It really does seem like a good way to have a speedy browser experience over even insanely slow network connections.


Does one then need a Firefox installation on the server, or can it be through a local Firefox installation?

Edit: according to comments below the headless browser (i.e., the Firefox installation) runs on the server. After this, the smaller bandwith data gets sent directly over SSH.


The point is it works without graphics so you can use it over ssh, for example.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: