I was asked for my thoughts, not an argument intended to convince anyone, so that’s what I gave. :)
There are several other comments on this page that go into some of the factual errors.
I reviewed the titles and posting frequency of recent articles on the site, and it strongly pattern-matched in my brain as “content farm”, which would be negatively corrated with article quality. I predict the author’s intention is to post one article a day, and I predict that having such a posting frequency as a primary motivation is negatively correlated with quality.
I examined the author’s previous work in an attempt to understand his motivation behind writing and posting such an article; I’ve noticed that articles written out of a personal desire to communicate an idea tend to be better constructed or have a different “voice” than this article, so I wanted to understand where the author was coming from in the larger context. I only “attacked” because of the strength of the pattern-match I found.
