I've used DSPs and embedded systems, those compilers have sufficient quirks already and usually don't follow the standard to the letter. I'm not worried about "signal" values, I'm worried about pointer arithmetic values.
x86 SIMD is saturating as well
> If you want your naive overflow checks to work on your x86 project, why not just use a compiler option like -fwrapv?
Fair enough. Or people can stop pretending that UB is just an excuse to throw your hands in the air and do whatever they want with the code. Including null checks.
Because when things blow up it's on the major platforms.
x86 SIMD is saturating as well
> If you want your naive overflow checks to work on your x86 project, why not just use a compiler option like -fwrapv?
Fair enough. Or people can stop pretending that UB is just an excuse to throw your hands in the air and do whatever they want with the code. Including null checks.
Because when things blow up it's on the major platforms.