Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Pseudonymity makes this possible. Users don't post selfies on Reddit, nor their names, nor do they friend people (though you can follow users). On FB users fear for their privacy, and users fear moralizers.



> Pseudonymity makes this possible.

It makes me think that privacy is highly underestimated by Facebook. While it was once their key value proposition that real identity was desirable on a social site, with increasing political polarization and increased threats of government surveillance, the roles are now reversed and we'll continue to see privacy being treasured.

I have a Facebook account I NEVER post to and only check twice a week for about 30 seconds each instance. I do however spend an inordinate amount of time on Reddit. So much so that I deliberately have to wean myself off Reddit otherwise I'll waste too much time on it.


But there is a lot of groupthink on Reddit, too. Some popular forms you just have to stay out of if you have a different opinion.


Sure, but so there is in FB. On Reddit you can have multiple accounts (all pseudonymous) and you can participate on whichever subreddits you like. If there's some sub that isn't too welcoming of your views, chances are there is another that is -- an echo chamber if you want it thus, sure, but no worse than FB.


You can also have multiple accounts and pseudonymous accounts on FB. Sure, I think it's against their TOS (unlike Reddit) but I see people doing it.


It's a pain, so few do it.


There are also spaces which are extremely tolerant to difference of opinion. You can choose those.

r/changemyview is one favorite example for excellent rational discourse on often very controversial topics.


I'll add r/NeutralPolitics to this list.


r/poltics is awful.

Its a Trump hate thread with very little objectivity.


And then there are those which require objectivity which can be cited and followed up upon. /r/AskHistorians is perhaps the best example of this.


There's nothing wrong with stating an opinion that is unpopular and being downvoted. It usually still contributes to the discussion.

But I agree that aggregate comment vote is not an indicator of correctness - more of whatever way the wind is blowing at a particular time in a particular community.


Why? The worst that will happen is you get downvoted.


You will get rate limited more severely the more downvotes you get.

I've also run into subreddits run by very biased moderators who will mark any stories as spam they disagree or competes with their friends. And due to the shadowban system, many people never realize it.

That's why I stopped submitting comments and stories on reddit. I only browse it now.


Yeah, I don't get the idea of shadowbanning. It seems like a particularly capricious feature.


shadow-banning is handy for spammers and bad-posters because, to them, it looks like their posts are public. Its not hard to find out if you're shadowbanned (use incognito mode), but it often does the trick.

In the subs I mod I have a long list of awful contributors on an auto-remove list executed by automoderator. I've got people who have been saying awful thing to people for years, but those posts are never seen. Banning them will only lead them to create a new account.


I wonder if Facebook happens to know people's Reddit ids through some nefarious data collection scheme.


I'm not sure about that but 100% what you post on reddit will get you targeted for specific ads that appear on facebook


Corresponding to the subreddit you post in (worrisome but understandable), or the content of your comment (scary)?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: