A nice analysis of the worm that was published shortly after the incident is "With Microscope and Tweezers:
An Analysis of the Internet Virus of November 1988" by Eichin and Rochlis [1].
I was an intern at IBM UK at the time and I remember it caused quite a lot of interest, and perhaps confusion. The gateway between IBM's corporate network (VNET, mainly) and and the (then) academic-only internet was shut down for a few days while people got a grip on exactly what was going on. Simpler times.
I'd imagine the people that had to clean up after him were a lot more sensitive about it. Posting the source for historical reasons would be one way to make amends.
I remember some folks in Berkeley (Bostic?) posting a patch to fix the bug in the worm! The worm was discovered because it kept infecting the same machines again and again; the patch fixed this bug. Ah, good times.
I was an intern at IBM UK at the time and I remember it caused quite a lot of interest, and perhaps confusion. The gateway between IBM's corporate network (VNET, mainly) and and the (then) academic-only internet was shut down for a few days while people got a grip on exactly what was going on. Simpler times.
[1] http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ece845/docs/eichin.pdf