An interesting idea, but complicated by the fact that as often as not the terms expressed are affected by the domain and locale.
For example, for every employment contract that contains a non-compete in California, there is relevant California state law that means it's probably unenforceable. What do you show for that?
Additionally, new case law is being made all the time. Laws aren't static, they are added to, amended or removed through legislature and case law. To my understanding, the case law changes are also more about the specific circumstances of the case as well, so may apply narrowly or widely, depending on ruling. And may be appealed.
For example, for every employment contract that contains a non-compete in California, there is relevant California state law that means it's probably unenforceable. What do you show for that?
Additionally, new case law is being made all the time. Laws aren't static, they are added to, amended or removed through legislature and case law. To my understanding, the case law changes are also more about the specific circumstances of the case as well, so may apply narrowly or widely, depending on ruling. And may be appealed.