I understand that point and I agree. What I'm saying is that upon reading the article closely, I noticed he was primarily promoting the "view infinite as arbitrarily large" technique for dealing with the appearance of infinity.
Example quote from article:
"Interpret the problem as saying that the width of the capacitor is so large relative to its thickness that you don’t have to worry about edge effects."
Example quote from article: "Interpret the problem as saying that the width of the capacitor is so large relative to its thickness that you don’t have to worry about edge effects."