Even in your link there are multiple people calling it the next theranos or vaporware. Just because there happen to be some level-headed people here doesn't exclude that the majority of news pumped out is dubious about Magic Leap's ability to accomplish anything. Here's the latest story today: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/03/02/magic_leap_sues_sec...
You said you’ve never seen anyone call them the next Theranos or vaporware. You then proceed to link me to a bunch of neutral stories in which invariably someone does call them that and even after I gave you links supporting that notion. And here’s the thing, the skeptics have been forced to change their tune for the most part ever since the product was revealed in December. Of course no one will ever acknowledge that. No no, they always thought it was real... smh.
I don't think history actually shows this. Of course "innovation" is such a meaningless term that it's probably true by way of encompassing too broad of a definition.
Excited to see how raising almost $2 billion pre-revenue turns out.