This is a good article, but the author goofs here:
> “Apple says the handover is due to new regulations that cloud servers must be operated by local corporation. But this is unconvincing. China’s Cybersecurity Law, which was implemented on June 1 2017, does demand that user information and data collected in mainland China be stored within the border. But it does not require that the data center be operated by a local corporation.”
It’s common knowledge that the more authoritarian the country, the bigger the disconnect between the law and the truth-on-the-ground. I think it’s very likely that a party organ spoke to Apple and made it plain that “hand it over, or you’re out”. Which still has plenty of troubling implications, but criticism focused on Apple going beyond the letter of the law is disingenuous: the letter of the law is nothing in China.
> “Apple says the handover is due to new regulations that cloud servers must be operated by local corporation. But this is unconvincing. China’s Cybersecurity Law, which was implemented on June 1 2017, does demand that user information and data collected in mainland China be stored within the border. But it does not require that the data center be operated by a local corporation.”
It’s common knowledge that the more authoritarian the country, the bigger the disconnect between the law and the truth-on-the-ground. I think it’s very likely that a party organ spoke to Apple and made it plain that “hand it over, or you’re out”. Which still has plenty of troubling implications, but criticism focused on Apple going beyond the letter of the law is disingenuous: the letter of the law is nothing in China.