I did. It doesn't support what you're saying about the Rohingya, and it doesn't support your claim that things are worse in Bangladesh without anyone caring. Calling the Rohingya "basically the same organization" as the one that took part in the 1971 Genocide is complete nonsense.
You're basically saying they deserve this state led treatment as other Muslims nearby did unrelated bad things to Hindus.
I've read several well-reasoned comments of yours today that I agree with completely, but given that I don't want to become an expert on the Rohingya, it would be helpful if you all (i.e. in this entire subthread) were to lay out the specific facts upon which you are making these judgements.
Yes, everyone could read that entire Wikipedia page, look through its edit history, check the talk page, and check out the cited links. Most of us probably will not.
There are other well-reasoned arguments in this subthread and it seems like there is some disagreement on some fundamental facts.
