Seems like bad timing, the transaction fees compared to other crypto currencies are massive right now[1] and the transaction speed is just as bad, with 70.000 pending transactions[2]. Im assume that this situation is going to become better. Apparently one reason is, that segwit transaction space is barely used at the moment.
I think you're assuming that Square is going to do all of bitcoin transactions on chain.
I reckon they will handle most of these in their internal ledger the exact same way they handle USD type transactions. BTC could only move from the core secure wallets when BTC are leaving their systems.
There is probably no other way than to do it off-chain. I guess the transactions required to send your bitcoin to a wallet(if this feature will be enabled) might already be a problem. but this brings us to the entire bitcoin as a store of value idea, square will probably avoid the fees with bulk purchase of bitcoins. I have a big problem with that, bitcoin block rewards relative to the total value of bitcoin are going to decline over time. After the 2020 halving the block reward will be less than 2% the value of the network[1]. i assume satoshi imagined that overtime people will use transaction fees to secure the network. with bitcoin core moving to off chain solutions with no fees, i dont see how this will work out.
Bitcoin has increased so much in value that those tiny transaction fees that you paid are now worth a lot of dollars. It's a problem all right, but it's a comparably nicer problem to have than a cryptocurrency that isn't worth as much or that isn't as heavily used or both.
Er, no, bitcoin going up is nice if you hold bitcoin like gold, and irrelevant if you imagine actually using bitcoin as a way to do transactions. Bitcoin going up or down in value relative to other cryptocurrencies is orthogonal to the problem that it is inconvenient and expensive as a way to move money.
They should really accept multiple cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is too slow now with the blocks full. At least Ethereum, Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash should be considered.
If Square wants to be a cash intermediary, they should offer Monero. It's the most cash-like coin available since it's the only one that's fungible - an important aspect of any currency. The only problem is that it's not as recognized as Bitcoin, so maybe they're just trying to attract publicity and new users?
The ring signatures have a big scalability problem, and the cryptographoic strenght of the monero anonymity is all but proven. Monero is an interesting experiment but its feasibility as a long term store of value is to be provem.
Also, moving some transactions off-chain transaction will effectively mix the coins and strenght anonymity.
Why would they implement Bitcoin. Guys, seriously Ethereum is a way better method for actual payments. Shorter block times, the network is not congested at all, and they already process more transactions than BTC does per day.
Bitcoin has name recognition with the general public. Full stop.
Whatever the technical advantages/disadvantages are between those two (and any others) I imagine only Bitcoin has enough demand for them to think it would be worthwhile to implement.
> Bitcoin has name recognition with the general public.
I completely agree. Furthermore, this is the exact reason the miners, business, and community need to kill the Bitcoin chain and hand the title over to Bitcoin Cash which might actually be worth building infrastructure on.
>Guys, seriously Ethereum is a way better method for actual payments.
>Shorter block times
transaction security is proportional to confirmation time, not # of blocks. if you want even faster "block times", you can accept 0conf transactions. although to be fair it does allow you to be more flexible in terms of confirmation policy (you can't set your policy to confirm on 0.2 blocks).
>the network is not congested at all
...with a blockchain that's growing at a rate that's over 3x of bitcoin. in the same respect, you can argue that litecoin is better because it has faster blocks, lower fees, and no congestion.
>they already process more transactions than BTC does per day
What a neat marketing trick! As nobody uses Square Cash today, they want to attract the loyal-to-death Bitcoin crowd in hopes to save their product as pretty much everybody's using Venmo now and Cash didn't get any adoption.
Sending money to your debit card was free for a time, and I had no problem sending 400-500 bucks to a friend same day as a result. At this point, it’s just a matter of “why switch?”
Digital currency trading firm Genesis Global Trading found bitcoin tends to recover dramatically from large drops. The last four times bitcoin has fallen more than 20 percent this year, it has gained an average 28 percent in the two weeks following, and an average 61.5 percent in the four weeks following, the analysis showed.
[1]https://bitinfocharts.com/de/comparison/transactionfees-btc-...
[2]https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h