> You at least know that neural pathways are still formed when outside the womb
> You are a human being and therefor amateur psychologist by default, you are literate, and you have internet access. There is no excuse.
So, by logic, if a child hasn't been taught to read and write by the time they're 3-years-old, they will never recover, they will always be less successful? That's my excuse then, I'm arguing with you because my neural pathways weren't well formed when I was 2-years-old.
From my experience, most people who claim to be experts on toddler brains aren't neurologists, they're flash card salesmen.
What I'm trying to say is that when we're talking about neurology and psychology, LOGIC is not useful.
---
But I digress. I can see this hits close to home for you, and that I'm raising your ire by wanting to discuss details when you see a large threat that needs to be eliminated, not examined.
I concede that you may be right on this point. I completely agree, these videos should be removed from Youtube (for several reasons). But that doesn't preclude discussing the videos objectively.
So, by logic, if a child hasn't been taught to read and write by the time they're 3-years-old, they will never recover, they will always be less successful? That's my excuse then, I'm arguing with you because my neural pathways weren't well formed when I was 2-years-old. From my experience, most people who claim to be experts on toddler brains aren't neurologists, they're flash card salesmen.
What I'm trying to say is that when we're talking about neurology and psychology, LOGIC is not useful.
---
But I digress. I can see this hits close to home for you, and that I'm raising your ire by wanting to discuss details when you see a large threat that needs to be eliminated, not examined.
I concede that you may be right on this point. I completely agree, these videos should be removed from Youtube (for several reasons). But that doesn't preclude discussing the videos objectively.
My apologies, and I wish you the best of luck.