The results are too weak and they're searching too hard for results. That's not to say the study itself is "wrong" just that they're motivated to find an issue to get published and media coverage, not to say "oh, it's fine".
The entire article can be summed up with the quote:
> Final results from the peer-reviewed study won't be released until at least the end of 2017.
Cellphone cancer studies are not in short supply. What we need is peer-reviewed reproducible studies.
The results are too weak and they're searching too hard for results. That's not to say the study itself is "wrong" just that they're motivated to find an issue to get published and media coverage, not to say "oh, it's fine".
The entire article can be summed up with the quote:
> Final results from the peer-reviewed study won't be released until at least the end of 2017.
Cellphone cancer studies are not in short supply. What we need is peer-reviewed reproducible studies.