Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

They do more harm than good, but the responses to them serve to show the importance of free speech.



Can you help me understand how they show importance of free speech?

I don't think using toxic speech accomplishes anything.


Milo, for example, will go somewhere and they will drown him out, protest, and interrupt his speech. Sometimes, they even manage to get the invite rescinded.

Slowly but surely, more and more people are seeing that people are trying to limit free speech. They are noticing that the universities are favoring certain types of speech.

What they are doing is bringing attention to the attempts to silence people. Slowly but surely, we are winning this fight. More people notice, more people speak out, more people exchange their ideas.

Their horrible speech (and Milo isn't that bad, I've listened to him) is enough to make people try to silence him. Before, it was quiet and nobody really noticed. Now, it has started to go mainstream.

Now, those who weren't paying attention are seeing the changes that have been underway since the 80s. And they are starting to speak up. They are starting to say, 'No, let them speak.'

It means more people are starting to speak out about our right to freely express and that many of those people aren't, you know, Nazis. Nazis make terrible frontmen for political movements. Really, they are just horrible people.

We are getting more socially acceptable people speaking out, instead of the outlandish.

It is a bit like how you can't mention State's Rights without being assumed to be a racist. That has been changing recently, as the subject matter is now weed and immigration. Those are easier causes for people to get behind than the racism usually associated with it.

So, it's changing. I see speech values changing rapidly. I've been at this since the 80s. I'm not dead yet, so I might just as well keep fighting the good fight. On my side are people like EFF and the ACLU, so I am in good company.


Hmmm, I've never thought of it that way. My liberal friends are pro state rights for pot and marriage equality (before it was federal).

Doesn't freedom of speech also mean I can protest speakers I don't like?

Also disagree on Milo. Flipped through his book and he is garbage.


Of course you can. However, if your protest is done in such a manner that it negates their ability to speak, you've taken away their rights.

Oh, Milo is just a trolling attention whore. He's harmless. You should go spend a day on voat.co. If you want to, let me know. I'll go guide you around. You will see horrible people. There are some good people but they are the minority.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: