>You would have to prove a) that it was evidence of a crime, and b) the police h... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		katastic on Oct 20, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: A Test of Police Body Cameras Defies Expectations >You would have to prove a) that it was evidence of a crime, and b) the police had reason to believe or know it was such. Missing audio and a big "redacted" sticker is a pretty damning evidence that "Something" was removed. IF there was nothing to hide, why did they remove it?

QAPereo on Oct 21, 2017 [–]

That’s logic, not Law.

matt4077 on Oct 21, 2017 | [2 more]

[flagged]

sctb on Oct 21, 2017 | | [–]

Please don't post like this here.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact