Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But it seems the discussion is highly redacted and the papers that are up for discussion are chosen by a panel.

So, as I understand it, it's not like you can ask questions about a random paper you are currently reading, and ask the community for help.



> it's not like you can ask questions about a random paper you are currently reading

In the early days of the web, I remember a service that allowed you to comment on any page on the web. I think it used frames. It embedded the page you were looking at into a frame and allowed anyone to comment in the margins -- it looked a lot like Fermat's Library. Unfortunately I can't remember what the service or start-up was called.

I thought it was a great idea and very democratizing. You could comment on a newspaper article even if they didn't allow commenting. You could comment on Coca-Cola's page or anywhere on the web. What killed it wasn't spam, advertising, trolling, or inane YouTube-style comments. Certainly those would have been problems to deal with if the service got really popular.

What killed it was copyright. Some company sued them out of existence because they were ostensibly violating copyright by embedding someone else's page.


Sidewiki was another approach, I don't think copyright killed it. A bit of googling shows something pretty similar though: https://epiverse.co/

Close one door, and three plugin frameworks shall open, I guess.


> Close one door, and three plugin frameworks shall open, I guess.

Yeah, but that means three standards, and thus dilution of the usefulness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: