Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Does this mean that Nim 1.0 will be postponed even further?

That's OK, it's better to get it right, and it's still useful for small projects in the meantime. But Nim seems like a language that is never truly finished.

I like this direction. I tried to avoid "ref" in my last Nim project, but it's too hard to do that for every type the way the language is currently designed.




> Nim seems like a language that is never truly finished

True for every language.

"1.0" will freeze the spec and it's not like the current versions are unstable or unusable.


It won't be postponed AFAIK


Indeed, Araq's plan is to release v1 ASAP (he said by the end of this year on IRC) and implement the ideas described in this article afterwards for a Nim v2.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: