To red team that line of reasoning: hold on to the hacked data but don't use it, wait till public forgets about it, don't give business/lawmakers a reason to neuter the data, then strike a few years down the line.
It's a response to people with crass, Reddit-like usernames, like BloodyDickFart. Sound comment or not, I'd rather not engage in that type of conversation. I don't expect people to use their real names, a username is fine, I said novelty names.
Quotes can have multiple meanings, some of which oppose each other.
Generally one is expected to use context clues to disseminate which meaning is most relevant to a given sample of text.
In this case they were to indicate a somewhat mocking tone in my paraphrasing.
The exact quote actually managed to be more condescending than that:
>
Commentors with novelty usernames should not expect responses.
On a totally unrelated note, you sound like a wonderfully pleasant person to interact with. I am deeply saddened those of us with "novelty usernames" might miss out on that.
