"Ask candidates about conflicts — note if they focus more on plot or perspectives."
I give a fair amount of interviews and asking about how a candidate approached a conflict does bring out useful signal, mostly for raising red flags. A candidate will generally state a problem and say something to the effect of, "I talked to the other person, pointed on these facts X, Y, Z and the other person got on board." It's helpful to know that the candidate uses reason, but if they use facts to steamroll a teammate, that would raise red flags. If the candidate can articulate why those facts would help their teammate get on board e.g. empathizing with the other person, this is a good signal.
I give a fair amount of interviews and asking about how a candidate approached a conflict does bring out useful signal, mostly for raising red flags. A candidate will generally state a problem and say something to the effect of, "I talked to the other person, pointed on these facts X, Y, Z and the other person got on board." It's helpful to know that the candidate uses reason, but if they use facts to steamroll a teammate, that would raise red flags. If the candidate can articulate why those facts would help their teammate get on board e.g. empathizing with the other person, this is a good signal.