I'm guessing this was an intentionally snarky comment, but the article includes the cost of buying a Chromebook in the figures it provides so "buy a decent laptop" would have a monthly cost associated with it.
In addition, Starbucks -- at least the one near me -- doesn't allow you to occupy a seat without purchasing something and since the Internet service offered there is subsidized by coffee ... very expensive coffee, at that ... the cost of using Starbucks[0] daily for 5 business days/over 4.5 weeks/month assuming you get away with buying only one Venti Starbucks regular coffee at USD$2.45 is about the cost of broadband at home, not including fuel to drive there and back (assuming you didn't walk/ride a bike)... and there's no preemptible VMs included with the brew.
[0] I skipped library internet access because, at least for me, the performance is so bad at my public library I wouldn't consider that viable Internet service. And it smells like books there.
it wasnt snarky at all, i have no idea why people downvoted it. i am extremely poor and starbucks and libraries are great places to use the internet and get things done. ive never encountered a starbucks that made you buy something. but that doesnt matter because free wifi is everywhere. just find a safeway, a cafe, or any other such place. i actually prefer the slower speeds you typically find in those places because they are perfectly adequate for downloading documentation, pushing to github and so on, ie do productive things. but it makes wasting time on youtube very painful.
Probably because you didn't include the laptop's price. If you spent $300 and it lasts you four years, that's already $6.25/month. Sure you get internet access for free, but so could the author, it's not like you can't take a Chromebook to Starbucks or the library.
