For the first ~25 page or so the book is nothing but this guy who goes to biking with his friends and son.
Maybe my expectation was too high, maybe I was hoping to be blown away by some deep philosophical understanding. Or maybe its the writing style, I felt like I was reading someone's diary, reading his mundane everyday thoughts.
Absolutely nothing. Just a guy riding his bike for ~25 pages.
I stopped reading where he was yelling at his kid for some stupid reason during camping. Maybe after that he talks about something interesting.
I will probably give it another shot, most likely not anytime soon.
Reading a non-fiction book is an investment of time and energy. 25 pages in to the book and the author didn't even begin to address the point of the book, which was a big turn-off for me, I have never read a book that just talks about random stuff for the first 25 pages or so. I thought it was a very weird way to start off a book.
I am sure its a decent book, or there wouldn't be so many fans out there, so I will give it another try.
> Reading a non-fiction book is an investment of time and energy.
No doubt.
> 25 pages in to the book and the author didn't even begin to address the point of the book
It's biographical philosophy. 25 pages of setting the stage for the author's philosophical epiphany in the midst of a pivotal motorcycle trip in his life is addressing the point of the book.
I think perhaps you weren't expecting it to be a biographical book. Perhaps when you give it another go, you should take a quick look at the afterword (regarding the author's son) to get a better grasp of the author's perspective.
Zen is an overrated book. Having said that, to say that "I have absolutely no idea why people like this book" when you haven't read it (and 25 pages does not count) sounds completely absurd. I do recommend you actually try reading it, even if for no other reason then to find out what everyone else is on about.
I wouldn't call Zen overrated, at least insofar as it's a relatively easy read which makes some good points.
Those points, IMO, are not the author's main philosophical contention, but his presentation of philosophical introspection intertwined with everyday life. Would that more Americans realized they could contemplate metaphysics even while going about their everyday lives.
By "overrated" I don't mean that it's bad. It's overrated in the same way that The Mythical Man Month is the most overrated software engineering book, or Sgt. Pepper is the most overrated album. Those are important works, but they don't live up to the level of hype around them. In fact, I don't think anything could.
I agree with your point, though. (But not sure why it only applies to Americans? ;)
Maybe my expectation was too high, maybe I was hoping to be blown away by some deep philosophical understanding. Or maybe its the writing style, I felt like I was reading someone's diary, reading his mundane everyday thoughts.
Absolutely nothing. Just a guy riding his bike for ~25 pages.
I stopped reading where he was yelling at his kid for some stupid reason during camping. Maybe after that he talks about something interesting.
I will probably give it another shot, most likely not anytime soon.