I didn't mean to imply that both can't be done at the same time. I thought you meant that diversity programs were an inherent part of finding the best talent when you wrote
> "It's Google's perogative/obligation to find and retain the best talent. I suspect that's what the purpose of their diversity programs are for."
To me this meant that to find the best talent it's more effective to focus on subsets of the total talent pool, which didn't make sense to me.
> "It's Google's perogative/obligation to find and retain the best talent. I suspect that's what the purpose of their diversity programs are for."
To me this meant that to find the best talent it's more effective to focus on subsets of the total talent pool, which didn't make sense to me.