If we talk about tolerance as a peace treaty (which the article encourages us to do) then I might rephrase what you said slightly differently:
"Holding people to account for breaking the treaty is not the same as breaking the treaty"
If you accept my rephrasing, then I would like to argue that many things which people claim as "taking a stand against intolerance and bigotry" are themselves acts which break the peace.
If tolerance is not a moral precept then it cannot in any sense belong to an ideology.
"Holding people to account for breaking the treaty is not the same as breaking the treaty"
If you accept my rephrasing, then I would like to argue that many things which people claim as "taking a stand against intolerance and bigotry" are themselves acts which break the peace.
If tolerance is not a moral precept then it cannot in any sense belong to an ideology.