On: I don't like Python. Does that make me a bad person?

[grasshoper]

Python for me is the language closest to pseudocode. There are no decorations and few gimmicks. You simply write your ideas down into code.

[i80and → grasshoper]

On the contrary, it has had decorators since Python 2.4.

[silentbicycle → i80and]

"decorations", not "decorators".

I think it's fairly clear from context that he/she means, "not a lot of red tape", rather than a reference to specific language features.

[i80and → silentbicycle]

PEP-318 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0318/) refers to a decorated functions as a having a decoration.

Counter-edit: My response was in jest. I deliberately misinterpreted the term for humorous purposes.

[lelele → grasshoper]

> Python for me is the language closest to pseudocode.

Python for me is the imperative language (with some functional features) closest to pseudocode.

[thedigitalengel → grasshoper]

The above comment applies here as well.