Does the same logic apply to female genital mutilation is societies where that has been acceptable for eons?
Is your standard for acceptable mutilation really "it isn't noticeably harmful"?
What if my religion calls for the removal of a single testicle instead of the foreskin - is that ok? Afterall, men with one testicle can still father children and lead productive lives.
If there was a culture going back thousands of years where men with a single testicle went on to live lives with hugely outsized outcomes, then yeah, I might say, "hey, maybe they know something we don't."
Is your standard for acceptable mutilation really "it isn't noticeably harmful"?
What if my religion calls for the removal of a single testicle instead of the foreskin - is that ok? Afterall, men with one testicle can still father children and lead productive lives.