3. Is testifying for the promise of leniency of immunity.
4. And is quite happy to throw the CEO, the CFO, and, since the FBI asked him about your name, you under the bus.
Regardless of whether or not his claims are true, he will be happy to testify that yes, you absolutely knew about the criminality, because you discussed it with him at lunch, and did nothing about it.
This may, or may not be true. He may or may not have misremembered this conversation. He may be trying to save his ass. Either way, it's your word against his, and the prosecutor, who pleads to the jury that there is no possible way you didn't know about your involvement.
You may well be found innocent, but you never want to put yourself in this position. Talking to the police is just giving them more rope to try to hang you with.
1. Worked with you.
2. Is neck-deep in the criminal enterprise.
3. Is testifying for the promise of leniency of immunity.
4. And is quite happy to throw the CEO, the CFO, and, since the FBI asked him about your name, you under the bus.
Regardless of whether or not his claims are true, he will be happy to testify that yes, you absolutely knew about the criminality, because you discussed it with him at lunch, and did nothing about it.
This may, or may not be true. He may or may not have misremembered this conversation. He may be trying to save his ass. Either way, it's your word against his, and the prosecutor, who pleads to the jury that there is no possible way you didn't know about your involvement.
You may well be found innocent, but you never want to put yourself in this position. Talking to the police is just giving them more rope to try to hang you with.