>There's a expose like this every couple of years, but nothing ever changes.
Why would it? These are not "predatory journals," they are akin to diploma mills for quack scientists and it's a mutually beneficial arrangement. Scientists get published, and the publisher gets paid.
The only one harmed in this arrangement is a hypothetical third party, and that is dubious.
Why would it? These are not "predatory journals," they are akin to diploma mills for quack scientists and it's a mutually beneficial arrangement. Scientists get published, and the publisher gets paid.
The only one harmed in this arrangement is a hypothetical third party, and that is dubious.