On the Mac, I edited /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/searchplugins/google.xml, changing http to https where appropriate. Now the builtin Google search plugin uses SSL system-wide (and so does the autocomplete, AKA suggest queries feature, if you edit that link, as well). Hopefully, Firefox will make this the default.
You're probably right, but why post a blog about it announcing it to the world as if it is available before everything is synced up and ready? It makes Google look sloppy, IMO.
hello, I'm a blackberry user. I do like the site.... When I'm using a computer. However there's placement errors on the BB scripting side.
Highlighting over the buttons puts the button text over the link (search, I'm feeling ducky, etc.). If I knew of a way to send a screenshot, I would. If you need basic sanity checking so DDG looks pretty on the BB, email me at jwcrawley at gmail daught com
It's a good idea, but I question how useful it really is. So, my search results page for "naughty things" is encrypted, but all the links on it aren't.
Except that data's still available on all sites you land on, to all the 3rd party analytics platforms people use, all the ad networks people use, and to everything you pass through on your way to a destination.
As the duckduckgo guy puts it:
"When you search on Google, not only is your info stored, but also when you click on a link, your search terms are passed on to that site via the Referer header. A lot of sites use this information to tailor content and advertising to you specifically. Your searches also show up in analytics tools, which people use for SEO and other tracking purposes. This information leakage creates legitimate privacy concerns."
And what's to stop ISPs logging the plain text https urls you access anyway?
Not exactly correct. If the URL you click on is HTTPS, then the referrer is sent. HTTPS->HTTP no referrer. HTTPS->HTTPS referrer (even if the domain changes). The encryption is preventing the network from seeing the data, not the remote hosts. If the browser sends the referrer encrypted, even to a different remote host, the network still can't see it.
Translation: I am convinced beyond help that Google is evil, I am trying to find any and all reasons to point out how evil they are. However, currently I am out of ideas.
Not that they're evil. I use Google for a bunch of stuff - personal email, search, adsense, analytics, and have for years. I just think it's a bit of a fallacy to protect us from 'someone else' knowing about us given the penetration they have into most internet users lives.
Their business model is to give you relevant ads based on information that you give them in exchange of using their service. They even let you opt-out[1] of their system so that they can't track you and give you relevant ads (enjoy tampon ads on programing page).
Better yet. Use noScript, ad-blocker, flash-blocker, don't use Google services (or at least use privacy mode on search), in addition to opting-out from Advertising cookie[1].
As for me, the least I can do is to support a company, while not with a perfect track record, has championed and fought for an open web with plethora of free and exceptional services.
I can live with that, knowing that I have the option to opt-out whenever I want to.
