The article rather un-critically accepts the necessity of DRM. That very necessity is quite questionable, given that almost all video uploader to YouTube don't really care about their "property rights", and are more concerned with getting the message out there, with escaping obscurity.
This is the kind of article that makes people get on the ol' tin-foil hat about how media conglomerates carefully control ("censor") the content they put out there.
This is the kind of article that makes people get on the ol' tin-foil hat about how media conglomerates carefully control ("censor") the content they put out there.