Oh yeah, the doublespeak is definitely grand, too. But Tate's rambling responses fall short in comparison to Jobs' eloquence.
Look: most people want something mostly simple and mostly worry-free and mostly nice-looking. Apple thinks the best way to deliver that is to present apps using their approach. The increased competition they face means their ideas are being tested, and we'll find out who wins.
For instance, the iPhone OS fragmentation is an additional hit to what had been a very clean development space. That, the closed approach to app approval, and other constraints make it less attractive to develop in that space. But ultimately, saying, "I don't like how you run your app store" is all fine and good: don't develop there. But absent an equally successful alternative, it's a bit early to call the game against Apple.
Look: most people want something mostly simple and mostly worry-free and mostly nice-looking. Apple thinks the best way to deliver that is to present apps using their approach. The increased competition they face means their ideas are being tested, and we'll find out who wins.
For instance, the iPhone OS fragmentation is an additional hit to what had been a very clean development space. That, the closed approach to app approval, and other constraints make it less attractive to develop in that space. But ultimately, saying, "I don't like how you run your app store" is all fine and good: don't develop there. But absent an equally successful alternative, it's a bit early to call the game against Apple.