You're making a No True Scotsman argument by saying that it's not a Muslim ban because Trump didn't ban enough muslims. You're also completely ignoring the fact that Bannon very likely spent some time determining what sort of ban would and wouldn't be defensible. The use of 8 U.S. Code ยง 1187 wasn't by accident.
Also, your excuse about connections to terrorists needs citations because, from what I've read, these connections don't actually exist.
Also, your excuse about connections to terrorists needs citations because, from what I've read, these connections don't actually exist.