Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's exciting to think about a 10x improvement in CPUs. This would literally change our lives.

For anyone considering getting involved or investing could you fill in a couple of bio details?

>Ivan Godard has designed, implemented or led teams for...an operating system, an object-oriented database

Cool, which OS and database?

>taught computer science at graduate and post-graduate level at Carnegie-Mellon University

Which courses?




Someone asked something similar a while ago: http://blog.kevmod.com/2014/07/the-mill-cpu/

Ivan responded to the post but didn't address the questions about his bio at all, but perhaps he doesn't feel the need to.

For the curious, his name apparently was Mark Rain for some time in the 70s/80s [1] – there are a number of publications under that name.

[1] http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.arch/2012-...


Why would he not feel a need to?

All of us have to maintain detailed bios when seeking funding, trying to build a team, or building corporate partnerships, all of which appear to be on the table.


Our industry is a surprisingly small pond, at the top anyway. No one would invest in the Mill based on my formal bio "College dropout; never took a CS course in his life" :-)

Instead they invest based on our technology, most of which (and eventually all) we make publicly available. You may not be able to judge it, but any potential partner has people who can. One of the things that encouraged us in our long road is that the more senior and more skilled the reviewer, the more they loved the Mill. Quotes like "This thing is the screwiest thing I've ever seen, but it would work - and I could build it".


I don't think many people care about a degree. It's just weird that you ask interested people to join you but seem reluctant to give details on your bio. A lot of people factor it in when deciding on joining or dealing with a startup.


Judge us on the tech, not on me. To be honest, if you cannot already understand what we have put out to the public well enough to know that you want to work on it, then you are probably still too junior to be really useful as we are now. We can't afford the cost of ramping people up if they are not already there.

As we grow there will be more place for beginners, but not yet. Mind, that's beginners as in concept understanding, not beginners as in age or degrees. I'm a dropout, and this year we added an intern in Tunisia who's still finishing his exams. We let people self-select, we don't try to persuade them. And we don't pay them, so only the convinced join.

In a way, at the top of engineering things work much more like they do in the arts: you are judged by your portfolio, not by your background or education.


"Judge us on the tech, not on me." Hans Reiser and ReiserFS taught everyone that the person's bio _does_ matter for the project.


I don't think anything in his bio or not in his bio conveyed that he would murder his wife and go to prison for life thus abandoning the project.


Ah, Mark Rain brings back memories of his Mary language...


You show your age :-)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: