Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I understand it, all it takes is one share to have been sold at that price. Probably indicates someone having a "sell n shares at any price" order where n > buy orders at that moment..?

Regardless of the details, this is an example of how markets aren't perfectly efficient.



> Regardless of the details, this is an example of how markets aren't perfectly efficient.

No. Just that the last reported transaction may not be `true' price.

There are other arguments against efficiency of markets, but this isn't.


I don't think anyone claims the markets are 'perfectly' efficient. Even the people that believe they are efficient and choose to participate argue that they are exploiting the inefficiencies.


Furthermore the real question is, could the market possibly be made more efficient if some "expert" were there deciding when a trade was a bad idea?


Shouldn't they be experts on both sides of all (or at least most) trades already?


Probably.


  [citation needed]
"Experts" are overrated. The whole notion is fundamentally backward-looking.

You might as well consult a historian.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: