Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

And can you not see that:

> I don't see it as a good use of my time or energy to try to explain it to you

Is pretty arrogant, you have such high esteem for your perspective you don't think it could be wrong, in fact I'm biased for not understanding it;

You're suggesting, instead, that I must have to go on some mysterious journey-of-self, as if you were a wise zen master furnishing me with enlightenment; rather than supporting your own, somewhat basic, claim that "the ban supports the antis"...




It's interesting to see how you interpret my words. Thanks for the discussion.


> Thanks for the discussion.

Maybe it's my biases, but that seems pretty passive-aggressive.


Earlier:

> Thanks for the reply.

Also passive-aggressive?


Probably not, at that point it wasn't clear that the statement was unlikely to be true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: