> * I actually know the answer to this one and it's actually a technical constraint.
Not really. I mean sure in the sense that they'd have to run the third rail as you mention, but that's not a technical constraint given how simple it is. And theoretically it's in progress.[0]
The problem here is plainly political. If the politics of building trains in this country weren't completely broken it would have been done long, long ago.
Not really. I mean sure in the sense that they'd have to run the third rail as you mention, but that's not a technical constraint given how simple it is. And theoretically it's in progress.[0]
The problem here is plainly political. If the politics of building trains in this country weren't completely broken it would have been done long, long ago.
[0] http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2016/04/newark_elizabeth_l...
Oh while we're talking about dysfunctional PATH decisions based on mindless political/organizational divisions here's another one that'll make your blood boil: http://newyorkyimby.com/2014/09/the-port-authoritys-missed-c...