Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How are economies that literally have no monetary policy a better alternative, though?


The US had no monetary policy for the first 100 years of its existence, going from subsistence farming to superpower.


> The US had no monetary policy for the first 100 years of its existence, going from subsistence farming to superpower

It was also rocked by regular financial panics during this period, including massive economic shocks when large gold and silver deposits were discovered that suddenly flooded the economy with new "money".


The US economy since has hardly been free of massive economic shocks, neither has any other monetary policy economy.


Nitpick: the US did not become a superpower until World War 1, when it dramatically expanded the size of government and the military.


even then, it's true super power status was achieved after ww2 when we did have the Fed. not a nitpick, it is a central part of his false premise.


How much of such super power status was derived from Fed itself vs a system that was able to distribute and allocate resources more efficiency than the time before?

One could argue that the Fed (and other central banking institutions), compared to times before was that more efficient system, but idealistically, efficient systems are not bounded by the present situation, just temporarily constrained by such. And as people like Bill Gross (who cofounded PIMPCO) are starting to publicly state in some form another, is loosing its effectiveness when it comes to managing resource allocation beyond the state we are at. There are a whole host of human endeavors that are not undertaken (think infrastructure investments) because its more profitable in the short term for large institutions to use their near zero interest credit lines on financial markets, but in the long term are blinded to opportunities that can only come from more efficiency in sectors like energy/mining/transportation.


i never made that claim. not sure why all of a sudden you're changing the subject. I was simply responding to the claim of " The US had no monetary policy for the first 100 years of its existence, going from subsistence farming to superpower. "


>not sure why all of a sudden you're changing the subject.

Well trying to connect this and bring it back to the topic of the original article…


The Federal Reserve was established in 1913, long before World War II.


The US was a financial basket case that entire time. See ( the unfortunately titled ) "A Nation of Deadbeats."


Quoting from the article: "At some point investors – leery and indeed weary of receiving negative or near zero returns on their money, may at the margin desert the standard financial complex, for higher returning or better yet, less risky alternatives."


I'd argue that they are not. It's more about the proper measure. Monetary policy is a tool attempting to hit a moving target.


> Monetary policy is a tool attempting to hit a moving target

By sweeping the ice in front of the economy-puck with a toothbrush.

There is an effect, just a lot of other stuff has a big effect too...


fwiw, gold doesn't have an economic policy either.

But the difference is that with fiat, "no policy" means they'll do whatever they want in the future. With cryptocurrency no policy is more like an unbreakable policy of no tampering.


Just like any other commodity.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: