Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Check out the service I'm working on: http://www.remarkbox.com

One of the design goals is to _not_ be disqus.




"_not_ be disqus" is a very vague goal. What problems with Disqus are trying to solve?


I don't want: to serve advertisements, to force people to link to their identity, to cause friction to an already engaged user (no signups form / no captcha), to feel like a bolted on service / widget (I want to feel like part of the site), cluttered ui with to many options.

Hard to put into words the things I don't want Remarkbox to be.


Disqus started with a similar goal, but they had to make changes to make money. What will give you a different path?


Charge site owners for the value added. Stay small but still turn a profit. No investor money so not forced to grow and sell out user base (no ads).

Only add useful features to keep user experience decent.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: