An interesting read, but as nearly always, the article is followed by crappy commentary (Obama and Simpsons jokes). Wired is like the Digg of tech and science publications. Comments are almost always the best part for me when I read a story online, which is perhaps why I like HN so much. I wish submitters would choose sources with more appropriate audiences for these kinds of articles.
Edit: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/57964/title/Super...