I've asked some people that work on our UI to respond, but we're aware that we have some ways to go before it's really good and that the large changes that we're making can be painful at first.
> Other than that; I'd like to say that I have really liked using Pivotal Tracker for developing software. It has a rigid pipeline between requirements and results. Configurability ruins some productivity tools. It would be swell to have something like "Pivotal Tracker lite" associated with GitLab (in that GitLab CI is). It's not a difficult kind of software to do reasonably well, and it would make GitLab the ultimate software project productivity suite.
Could you elaborate on what kind of features we'd be required to add given your suggestion? What do we miss?
> Other than that; I'd like to say that I have really liked using Pivotal Tracker for developing software. It has a rigid pipeline between requirements and results. Configurability ruins some productivity tools. It would be swell to have something like "Pivotal Tracker lite" associated with GitLab (in that GitLab CI is). It's not a difficult kind of software to do reasonably well, and it would make GitLab the ultimate software project productivity suite.
Could you elaborate on what kind of features we'd be required to add given your suggestion? What do we miss?