Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So $26B in holdings to insure $1.372T in outstanding mortgages, that seem pretty low but since the taxpayers will cover the rest, I guess it's fine to continue handing out subprime mortgages.



They don't insure the value of the mortgage, they insure the shortfall between what the lender recoup in foreclosure vs. the outstanding loan balance.


I havent looked in detail lately - but I believe they issue bonds and the bond holders would be covering the impact of a market crash.

You would prefer if there was not such an insurance system required for home owners putting less than 20% down?


You would prefer if there was not such an insurance system required for home owners putting less than 20% down?

I know I would. It would be like the 90's again where banks had to only loan out to people who they thought wouldn't default.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: