- Sued randomly chosen executives of Google
- For someone unconnected to them uploading a video to YouTube
- Before Google owned YouTube or had any relationship with YouTube
- For a video that was taken down upon being reported
- By its new owner which promptly turned over information about the uploader to the authorities
And the judge convicted these randomly chosen executives?
How is there even standing to make them the defendants of this case?
It's hard to believe this actually happened.
That probably explains a lot about this decision.
- Sued randomly chosen executives of Google
- For someone unconnected to them uploading a video to YouTube
- Before Google owned YouTube or had any relationship with YouTube
- For a video that was taken down upon being reported
- By its new owner which promptly turned over information about the uploader to the authorities
And the judge convicted these randomly chosen executives?
How is there even standing to make them the defendants of this case?
It's hard to believe this actually happened.