Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems like the country is 50-50 divided on this. But more importantly, individual liberty is more important than majority rule. When the founding fathers created this country, they cared deeply about individual liberty, and worried about a tyranny of the majority. Even if a super-majority wants to deprive an individual or a minority group of its rights, they should not be allowed to.

A free country's first commitment is to personal liberty, and only secondly to democracy.



"A free country's first commitment is to personal liberty"

Excellent.


by definition a democracy is a tyranny of majority.... i think you mean secondary to the republic


No, it's to the Republic to make sure the ideals of true democracy take a secondary place to individual liberty for the very reason that true democracy can be tyrannical. That's why the Republic comes before the democracy.


"50/50 divided" means "nobody knows"


That's the one-testicle, one-breast, average-person fallacy.

There's more than one issue concurrently, and many people are actually dumb and wrong.


Wish I could upvote this twice.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: