What are you talking about? Compelling an artist to create and sign a work is ab...

swehner · on March 4, 2016

Here is how one commonly goes about defining free speech, "Freedom of speech is the right to communicate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship."

So that's a great freedom.

What you're saying is the other way around.

euyyn · on March 4, 2016

FWIU, _compelled speech_ is unconstitutional too.

swehner · on March 4, 2016

How do you distinguish this case from the obligation to sign tax returns? (I think that is 26 U.S. Code § 6061, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6061)

The talk a bit about it here, https://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivol...

And this is kind of similar but about the 5th Amendment. http://openjurist.org/775/f2d/1292/eh-mosher-v-internal-reve...

ominous · on March 4, 2016

Could Apple then invalidate what it was previously coerced to say AND not expect government retaliation or censorship?