Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Is Social Science Politically Biased? (scientificamerican.com)
10 points by aburan28 on March 4, 2016 | hide | past | favorite | 10 comments



So, I was thinking about reading some books on evolutionary psychology the other day. About how men prefer good looking young women, and how women prefer powerful/rich men with high social status and to a lesser degree tall and muscular men. How men think about sex more often than women. Etc. Personally, I find this stuff extremely depressing. It shows you that most animals and humans are not particularly nice, and it blows up many of the commonly held illusions in our culture, such as the idea that men and women are equal. I wonder, do many people prefer to simply deny these truths, rather than facing them and getting depressed?


Evolutionary psychology is a set of just-so stories. There's no science there, no way to remove massively confounding factors, no way to experiment. I suspect that in other cultures, in other times, evolutionary psychologists would have come up with different just-so stories to match whatever their local breeding preferences were.


But, it makes sense to me to examine the brain as a product of evolution. Does it have to be a science to have value?

> in other cultures, in other times

There is at least a substance to evolution, it's not the same as bible quotes


An example of these just-so stories from another culture is nihonjinron (日本人論). It's the study of Japanese people, and often propped up by pseudoscience or explanations based in evolution that are impossible to verify.


I don't see what depressing about admitting that we are different. I find it more depressing to pretend we are and be called out as sexist for being aware of the differences.


I agree. Considering I took a social science class recently, It seems to be if you dont agree with a set of standard ideas like on racism or whatnot then you're branded as not abiding by a persons "safe space". Everyone I knew in that class reffered to people who don't agree with them as invading their "safe space"


Hmm, I don't think 'diversity' is the answer, especially in a polarised environment like the US.

How about higher academic standards for objective analysis?


>58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican

Maybe Social Science seems so politically biased to the author because he can't label the 30% he left out under the insufficient binary separation of Democrat/Republican. They are political parties, not a complete breakdown of someone's political beliefs.


What a fluff piece. I had higher expectations of SciAm.


What would you have liked to see in a discussion of the subject?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: